Lyndon Bird FBCI |
The London Olympics is now over and we are still coming to
terms with its success. Those who had predicted chaos and possibly carnage have
been proven wrong. Every few years an
event or threat seems to emerge that gets everyone’s attention. Sometimes it is
an esoteric threat that few understand like the millennium bug; sometimes it something
that might harm us personally like a pandemic; sometimes it is a massive event
that might go dramatically wrong in innumerable ways. The odd thing is that the
predictions of doom and destruction thankfully never seem to manifest
themselves.
Now this is not being complacent, in fact just the reverse.
The positive message about this is that however complicated, large or
frightening a threat seems to be it can usually be mitigated perfectly well by
good planning, good organisation and plenty of practice. The Olympics did not
just happen at random, the organisers knew the dates and schedules for years,
they had the brainpower and expertise of leading experts from around the world
to call on, and they had time to test and rehearse everything until it was
perfect.
The problem most organisations face in dealing with Business
Continuity, however, is precisely the reverse of such high profile threats. If
something that is totally unpredictable happens at a random time and causes
large losses of property, assets or even lives what can you do to protect
yourself or your organisation? Unlike the millennium bug or the Olympics you
have no idea what the real threat is or when it could show itself. Business
Continuity Management (BCM) addresses this paradox by concentrating on
impacts rather than causes. It is impossible to identify every threat faced by
an organisation or the exact way in which even predictable threats like fire or
flooding will affect different businesses or individuals.
However, it is possible to identify what products or
services must be delivered in what timeframes, what resources need to be in
place to allow that to happen and how an organisation needs to be ready to deal
rapidly with any crisis regardless of cause. For example, those organisations
that had planned for staff shortages during a possible pandemic already had the
key components for their Olympic plan. The threat during a pandemic was that
staff would be too ill to come to work; the threat during the Olympics was that
they simply couldn’t get to work because of travel difficulties. However the
BCM question was the same: “how do we
continue our critical activities with low staff levels in the office?”
Concentrating on impacts, rather than threats is at the heart of BCM.
The UK Cabinet Office believes that this message is one that
small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) need to hear and heed. They claim that
SMEs account for 99.9% of all private sector enterprises, 59.4% of private
sector employment and 50.1% of private sector turnover. Without a resilient SME
sector the UK is unlikely to kick start the economy anytime soon. BCM will not
achieve this on its own accord but it is a core component to security,
longevity and success for any organisation.
The UK had a great Olympics by making the right decisions,
plans and provisions well in advance. Just because you cannot predict the exact
nature of a threat doesn’t mean you cannot do the same by concentrating on what
is really important for you to accomplish - regardless of the external circumstances
you find yourselves in.
Great post. I am looking to improve my business in every way possible. I was told I should hire an SEO consultant and I should look into business continuity planning just in case of an emergency. I think that sounds like a good idea to me.
ReplyDelete